<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Massood Joomratty, Immigration Lawyer - Canada</title>
	<link>http://www.askmassood.com</link>
	<description>Immigration Lawyer - Canada</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>JOBROX Solutions Inc. Interview:  How to bring in workers in the hospitality sector?</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2007-11-12-how-to-bring-in-workers-in-the-hospitality-sector/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2007-11-12-how-to-bring-in-workers-in-the-hospitality-sector/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 22:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2007-11-12-how-to-bring-in-workers-in-the-hospitality-sector/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hiring Foreign Workers? Here are some things you NEED to know! Recently, the Managing Partners of Peg Moves had the opportunity to meet with the principals of JOBROX, a reputable company addressing the needs of employers by bringing foreign workers to Canada. Because most of us are unfamiliar with this process and some of its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiring Foreign Workers? Here are some things you NEED to know! Recently, the Managing Partners of Peg Moves had the opportunity to meet with the principals of JOBROX, a reputable company addressing the needs of employers by bringing foreign workers to Canada. Because most of us are unfamiliar with this process and some of its trials and tribulations, we felt that our readership could greatly benefit from their expertise.</p>
<p>Massood Joomratty, one of the principals of JOBROX and a practicing  immigration lawyer was kind enough to answer some of the most common  questions regarding foreign workers and the red tape associated with work  visas. He provided fantastic insight into the process as well as some little  known facts of which all employers should be aware.</p>
<p><em>Q. As has been reported extensively in the news media lately, Alberta and  British Columbia are currently suffering from a drastic labour shortage. The  hospitality industry has been hit particularly hard by the lack of staff for  open positions. How serious is this shortage?</em></p>
<p>A. The situation is so serious that employers are increasingly resorting to  recruit from outside Canada. In 2006, there were 171,844 temporary foreign  workers living in Canada, which represents a 122-per-cent increase over 10  years. Temporary foreign workers entering Canada on the basis of a labour  market opinion represent about 50 per cent of this number. The remaining  foreign workers enter using exemptions under NAFTA or GATS, on student visas  or as spouses. There was a 400-per-cent increase in demand for foreign  workers in Alberta between May 2006 and May 2007.</p>
<p><em>Q. Are there any statistics telling us how many people we need?</em></p>
<p>A. Over the next nine years the restaurants, bars and caterers that make up  Canada&#8217;s foodservice industry will require an additional 181,000 workers.  While the demand for foodservice employees will grow an average of 1.8% per  year over the next nine years, the working-age population of 15- to  69-year-olds will grow by just 0.9%. [SOURCE: CANADIAN RESTAURANT &#038;  FOODSERVICES ASSOCIATION, Sept. 2007]</p>
<p><em>Q. Some Canadian companies are now hiring foreign workers as a solution to  this problem and many others are considering this as a solution but I  understand the process is complicated and that there are many steps an  employer needs to follow before they can hire people from another country.  What does an employer need to consider/do in order to hire foreign workers?</em></p>
<p>A. - The Federal government administers the &#8216;Temporary Foreign Worker  Program&#8217; (TFWP) through the Human Resources and Social Development Canada  (HRSDC) and Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC). Successfully hiring a  foreign worker is a two step process. It entails the following and involves  HRSDC and CIC:</p>
<p>HRSDC issues a Labour Market Opinion (LMO) and CIC is responsible for  issuing a Work Permit.</p>
<p>1. The Employer has to submit an application for Labour Market Opinion (LMO)  at a Service Canada (HRSDC) centre serving the employer&#8217;s region. This  application is meant to seek the approval from HRSDC to recruit from outside  Canada. Essentially it is an exercise to convince HRSDC that the Employer  has made considerable efforts to recruit &#8216;locally&#8217; and despite the fact that  the conditions of employment during any local recruitment efforts were up to  Canada standards, the Employer has not been successful in attracting local  talent.</p>
<p>2. HRSDC looks at its own &#8216;database&#8217; of Labour Market Information and  currently will only approve an LMO if the wages being offered to the Foreign  Worker is above average and in some instances if the Employer can  demonstrate that the recruitment efforts were Canada-wide. This can be very  expensive, especially when HRSDC insists on detailed advertisements in  National newspapers.</p>
<p>3. Currently there are some occupations classified as &#8216;Under Pressure&#8217;. The  BC and Alberta lists are somewhat different. For &#8220;Occupations Under  Pressure&#8221;, merely advertising on the government Job Bank for seven days may  be adequate. This is a free service.</p>
<p>4. Recently, HRSDC has been insisting that wages offered to prospective  Foreign Workers in many cases should be more than what local staff is being  paid. Employers are having a hard time trying to convince HRSDC that this  disparity is not healthy and cannot be implemented. This is an ongoing  battle between Employers (or their lawyers) and HRSDC</p>
<p>5. Processing times for LMOs have gone up from ten days to twenty weeks in  recent months. On September 24, 2007, the government announced an expedited  LMO process (E-LMO) for twelve occupations in BC and Alberta. (Seven in the  hospitality industry). This is a marked change in attitude and will give  Employers something they&#8217;ve been craving for - a fast-track to bringing in a  Foreign Worker. The E-LMO can be take between 8 to 10 days. Not all  employers will be eligible to participate in the E-LMO. There are some  strict requirements to be met.</p>
<p>6. Once HRSDC is satisfied that the wages and other work conditions meet  their expectations, a positive LMO is issued. Usually, an LMO is issued with  the worker&#8217;s name specified on the document. Only then can the Foreign  Worker apply for a Work Permit. In certain instances the LMO is issued with  only the number of positions to be filled stated. The Employer is requested  to provide the names of prospective workers as soon as they are recruited.</p>
<p>7. The next step is for the Foreign Worker to apply for a Work Permit. This  is usually submitted at a Canadian embassy that is responsible for the  geographic region where the FW legally resides. A Visa Officer will assess  the genuineness of the Worker by looking at his/her qualifications,  experience etc. The processing time for WP applications varies at different  embassies. It can take several weeks for a WP to be issued.</p>
<p>8. Processing times at some embassies are horrendously long [several months  up to even over a year]. This is also a way to control the flow from  specific countries. This is the unwritten and unpublished quota per embassy.</p>
<ul style="list-style-type: lower-roman"></ul>
<p><em>Q. Can an employer prepare the LMO themselves or should they seek legal  advice?</em></p>
<p>A. Although the employer can prepare the LMO, seeking legal advice is worth  the money. There&#8217;s the literature on HRSDC&#8217;s website and then there are  unpublished &#8216;rules&#8217; and &#8216;criteria&#8217; that Foreign Worker Specialists at HRSDC  take into account. Lawyers who have experience dealing with HRSDC can help  shorten the processing time and avoid unnecessary delay.</p>
<p><em>Q. What are occupations under pressure? Does this vary from province to  province? If my company needs people to fill these occupations, does that  speed up the time to receive the LMO?</em></p>
<p>A. Recruiting for an Occupation Under Pressure only reduces the whole  process by 10 to 14 days or so. There is no need to advertise extensively  for several weeks. The Employer only has to advertise on the Job Bank. The  processing time is unaffected since an application for LMO is submitted only  when proof of advert is available.</p>
<p><em>Q. What type of work permits are issued for foreign workers? How does this  vary based on the job for which they are hired?</em></p>
<p>A. Occupations in Canada are essentially classified as Skilled and Unskilled  (Low Skilled). Please see National Occupations Classification (NOC). Skilled  Occupations are classified as NOC Levels O,A and B and unskilled ones are  Levels C and D. The WP issued to either group is the same. However, there  are implications for both the Employer and the Foreign Worker.</p>
<p>The Employer has to pay return airfare if hiring a Low Skilled worker and  has to cover the first 90 days of health insurance. Furthermore, the  Employer has to make sure the Worker has affordable and humane  accommodation. Affordable accommodation has been a major challenge  especially in Alberta.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the &#8216;Low Skill&#8217; Worker cannot be accompanied by spouse and  children and has to leave Canada after the duration of the WP [usually 24  months]. The same Worker can only return to Canada on a WP after 4 months.  The Employer cannot simply renew a WP in this category.</p>
<p>For Workers in the Skilled Worker category, there is no obligation for  Employer to pay airfare. The Worker&#8217;s spouse is also issued a WP. This WP is  &#8216;open&#8217;, which means the accompanying spouse can work wherever he/she likes  and whatever hours. Furthermore, the Skilled Worker may qualify to immigrate  to Canada as a permanent resident under a Federal or Provincial program.  This is very attractive to Employers who want a long term employee.</p>
<p><em>Q. If a worker comes to Canada on a work visa for one company, can they look  for other jobs with companies who also have an LMO?</em></p>
<p>A. Yes. However, the Worker may be at risk and may be without status in  certain instances. The Worker has to apply for a WP and may have to wait  several weeks. There is no guarantee that a Visa Officer will approve the  Worker&#8217;s WP. If the second WP is denied, the Worker will be out of luck.  Workers who seek legal advice will know this and will think twice before  jumping ship. There is no rule however that prevents Worker poaching.</p>
<p><em>Q. What is JOBROX? What do you do for employers that eases the process of  bringing foreign workers to Canada?</em></p>
<p>A. Jobrox is a recruitment company that looks beyond our borders. We believe  the pool of workers is dry in Canada. We act as a reliable bridge between  ethical Employers and qualified workers.</p>
<p>Jobrox has its own in-house immigration lawyer with 10 years of experience.  We provide a comprehensive service that includes determining employer needs,  Foreign Worker screening, skills testing, interview, background/police  clearance and documents verification overseas. We work with reputable  institutions in the Workers&#8217; country of residence to test the Worker&#8217;s  skills. We offer training and orientation programs that will better prepare  the Workers to be successful in Canada. We offer settlement services in  Canada from the day the Worker arrives taking care of things from airport  pick-up to applying for SIN card, opening bank account, finding  accommodation, community introductions, finding schools for accompanying  children, finding work for spouses, places of worship etc etc. We have a  toll-free hotline for Workers to access us and we assign the Workers  Settlement Co-ordinators for the duration of their contract.</p>
<p><em>Q. What countries does JOBROX get foreign workers from? Do you have  representatives in these countries? Is having a representative in these  countries important to an employer? Why?</em></p>
<p>A. We focus our recruitment efforts in countries where the English language  is fluently spoken. This removes a big barrier in the Worker&#8217;s life in  Canada. We have offices in several countries and have dedicated staff who  are themselves HR professionals. Local staff are invaluable in the process.  They have extensive local knowledge and can easily detect fraud and can  evaluate competencies and references very promptly.</p>
<p>Our main source of Workers in the hospitality sector is Mauritius and Fiji -  both are 5-star destinations and as a result the Workers from those  countries are exposed to the highest standards in the industry. Furthermore,  Workers from Mauritius are fluently bilingual (English &#038; French). In Fiji,  we work under the auspices of the Fijian government and we have collaborated  with the Fiji Foreign Office and the Fiji Embassy in North America to ensure  that all our operations are performed ethically and at the same time  respecting local laws of Foreign Recruitment.</p>
<p><em>Q. What does JOBROX do to help a foreign worker acclimate themselves to  Canada and our way of life?</em></p>
<p>A. We provide an Orientation course to the Workers before they leave for  Canada.</p>
<p><em>Q. We have heard many horror stories about companies purporting to be able  to bring foreign workers to Canada. What is legal and what&#8217;s not and how can  an employer be assured that they are working with an ethical company who is  abiding by the laws of Canada? Can an employer be held responsible for any  illegal activities done by such a company?</em></p>
<p>A. A worker cannot be charged any recruitment fee. It is prohibited.  However, Employers should ascertain who the overseas partners of the  Canadian recruiters are and how much they are charging. Sometimes, the  overseas partner/operator will charge a small administrative fee. This fee  should not go into the thousands. It is perfectly legal for a Worker to pay  legal fees for WP application. Many employers also pay for the Orientation  and training provided overseas.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2007-11-12-how-to-bring-in-workers-in-the-hospitality-sector/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration target hits 25-year high</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-11-01-immigration-target-hits-25-year-high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-11-01-immigration-target-hits-25-year-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 18:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-11-01-immigration-target-hits-25-year-high/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Move aimed to address labour shortages, but critics say backlog also needs fixing

by MARINA JIMÉNEZ (From Wednesday&#8217;s Globe and Mail)

Ottawa has increased its annual immigration target to the highest level in 25 years, and aims to accept between 240,000 and 265,000 newcomers in 2007 &#8212; human capital needed to fill Canada&#8217;s &#8220;extraordinary&#8221; labour market requirements, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="headline">Move aimed to address labour shortages, but critics say backlog also needs fixing</div>
<div id="author">
<p class="source">by MARINA JIMÉNEZ (From Wednesday&#8217;s Globe and Mail)</p>
</div>
<div id="article" style="font-size: 100%">Ottawa has increased its annual immigration target to the highest level in 25 years, and aims to accept between 240,000 and 265,000 newcomers in 2007 &#8212; human capital needed to fill Canada&#8217;s &#8220;extraordinary&#8221; labour market requirements, Immigration Minister Monte Solberg says.</p>
<p>Mr. Solberg also acknowledged that Canada&#8217;s current immigration model is flawed and pledged to introduce changes to address the enormous backlog of 800,000 applicants, as well as to adjust the selection process so that skilled tradespeople can qualify to come here.</p>
<p>&#8220;We were built on immigration and we think it wasn&#8217;t just important in the past but is critical to the future,&#8221; he said in an interview. &#8220;The numbers are big because we think they&#8217;ll help the country.&#8221;</p>
<p>The minister&#8217;s annual report to Parliament, tabled yesterday, noted that Canada is on track to accept the high end of this year&#8217;s target of 225,000 to 255,000 immigrants. There were 262,236 accepted in 2005, a higher-than-projected number. About 60 per cent of these are economic immigrants and their dependants (including skilled workers, those sponsored under provincial nominee programs and live-in caregivers), while the other 40 per cent are family members and refugees. In 2007, Ottawa aims to accept 15,000 more economic immigrants than it did last year, and will freeze the number of grandparents and parents at between 18,000 and 19,000.</p>
<div class="nav" id="related">
<h4 id="rtta">Related to this article</h4>
</div>
<p>The top source country for immigrants continues to be China, which represented 16 per cent of all newcomers in 2005, followed by India (13 per cent), the Philippines (7 per cent), Pakistan (5 per cent) and the United States (3 per cent).</p>
<p>Immigration policy analysts and lawyers applauded Ottawa&#8217;s increased targets, but criticized the report for failing to set out specific solutions to the many problems that threaten to cripple Canada&#8217;s immigration model, including the backlog, waiting times of four to five years and a selection model that favours white-collar professionals over skilled tradespeople while Canada&#8217;s economy needs both.</p>
<p>Sharryn Aiken, a professor of refugee and immigration law at Queen&#8217;s University, said the targets are meaningless &#8220;if the government doesn&#8217;t ensure the tools to achieve them are put in place.&#8221;</p>
<p>Added Sergio Karas, an immigration lawyer: &#8220;This is the highest level in 25 years. If we are bringing in the kinds of immigrants the economy needs, it is a good thing, but if we&#8217;re bringing immigrants who cannot find jobs and get their credentials recognized, then we have a problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Solberg stressed the importance of giving immigrants the help they need to succeed in Canada, and noted that $307-million was pledged in last spring&#8217;s budget for language training and other settlement services, and $18-million for an agency to assess and recognize foreign credentials.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obviously the system must be much more responsive to labour market needs than it is today. We are working on that, but not prepared to announce today,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It is important to find a pathway for people who don&#8217;t have university degrees who want to play by rules and want to make a contribution . . . we want to find a way to get them in and find a pathway to permanent residency.&#8221;</p>
<p>Last week, Citizenship and Immigration Canada announced it would not support a plan to regularize the status of the estimated 200,000 undocumented workers in Canada, many of whom work in construction. Mr. Solberg said yesterday a program to allow in skilled tradespeople would address that.</p>
<p>Olivia Chow, an NDP MP, said the immigration target should be higher. &#8220;We need more immigrants because of our aging population. We need families and young people for productivity and economic growth,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>The report noted the comparatively low number of immigrants who speak French. In 2005, only 4.6 per cent of immigrants spoke French, compared with 50 per cent who speak English, despite the fact that Quebec took in 16.5 per cent of all immigrants. Quebec sets its own immigration targets and is in charge of selection. Thirty-six per cent of newcomers spoke neither French nor English.</p>
<p>In 2005, nearly 54 per cent of immigrants settled in Ontario, while 17 per cent went to British Columbia.</p>
<p>Lorne Waldman, a Toronto immigration lawyer, said that the skilled-worker program is in &#8220;total disarray&#8221; because of the long waiting times, and that he has many clients who decided to immigrate instead to the U.S. &#8220;Immigration policy has been completely neglected since the Conservatives came to power,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>*****</p>
<p><strong>Immigration changes</strong></p>
<p>Ottawa wants more immigrants and aims to accept up to 265,000 newcomers in 2007 - the highest level in more than a decade. Canada is on track to accept between 225,000 to 255,000 immigrants this year.</p>
<p>2005 immigrant breakdown*</p>
<p>Skilled workers: 130,242 - 49.67%</p>
<p>Business immigrants: 13,469 - 5.14%</p>
<p>Provincial nominees: 8,049 - 3.07%</p>
<p>Live-in caregivers: 4,552 - 1.74%</p>
<p>Spouses, partners, children and others: 50,881 - 19.40%</p>
<p>Parents and grandparents: 12,471 - 4.76%</p>
<p>Government-assisted refugees: 7,416 - 2.83%</p>
<p>Privately sponsored refugees: 2,976 - 1.13%</p>
<p>Protected persons: 19,935 - 7.6%</p>
<p>Dependants abroad: 5,441 - 2.07%</p>
<p>Humanitarian grounds: 6,653 - 2.54%</p>
<p>Permit holders: 143 - 0.05%</p>
<p>No category: 10 - 0.01%</p>
<p>*Numbers don&#8217;t add up to 100 due to rounding.</p>
<p><strong>Top 10 countries of origin, 2005</strong></p>
<p>China: 42,491</p>
<p>India: 33,146</p>
<p>Philippines: 17,535</p>
<p>Pakistan: 13,576</p>
<p>U.S.: 9,262</p>
<p>Colombia: 6,031</p>
<p>U.K.: 5,865</p>
<p>South Korea: 5,819</p>
<p>Iran: 5,502</p>
<p>France: 5,430</p>
<p><em>SOURCE: CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION CANADA</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-11-01-immigration-target-hits-25-year-high/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dual Citizenship</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-21-dual-citizenship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-21-dual-citizenship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-21-dual-citizenship/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadian citizenship is in the news these days because of the desperate efforts by Canada to evacuate its citizens stranded in Lebanon. I reproduce the following very helpful piece from the CBC website:

How do I find out if I&#8217;m a citizen of more than one country?
Contact the embassy or consulate of the country in question. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canadian citizenship is in the news these days because of the desperate efforts by Canada to evacuate its citizens stranded in Lebanon. I reproduce the following very helpful piece from the CBC website:</p>
<blockquote class="factbox factbox-half">
<h4>How do I find out if I&#8217;m a citizen of more than one country?</h4>
<p>Contact the embassy or consulate of the country in question. You will have to provide your place and date of birth, citizenship of your parents and/or grandparents and immigration details.</p>
<h4>If the country has no representatives in Canada, you can contact:</h4>
<ul>
<li>The Protocol Service of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade<br />
Ottawa, ON  K1A 0G2</li>
</ul>
<h4>Or:</h4>
<ul>
<li>Contact the Citizenship and Immigration call centre: 1 888 242 2100</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<h4>Most countries define citizenship based on one or more of these traits:</h4>
<ul>
<li>You were born on territory belonging to, or claimed by, that country.</li>
<li>One or both of your parents were citizens of that country.</li>
<li>You married a citizen of that country.</li>
<li>You (or one or both of your parents) obtained that country&#8217;s citizenship by going through a legal process of naturalization (living there for a period of time, passing a citizenship exam)</li>
<li>You lived in that country for an extended period of time.</li>
</ul>
<p>Canada&#8217;s Citizenship Act allows people to be citizens of two or more countries at the same time. This also means a person should know the rights and obligations required of them when they are in those countries of citizenship. The laws of the country where you are located take priority over the laws of any other country where you hold citizenship. International treaties, though, may override local laws.</p>
<h4>Some people may have dual nationalities and not realize it</h4>
<p>In some countries, such as the Republic of Korea, if your grandparents or parents were born there, the Korean government will classify you as a Korean citizen, even if you were born and brought up solely in Canada.</p>
<h4>Approximately 90 countries officially permit dual or multiple citizenship</h4>
<p>In some parts of the world, those born in a particular area are automatically entitled to citizenships of two countries. For example, those born in Northern Ireland are British citizens, but they can claim Irish citizenship as well, because the Republic of Ireland extends its full citizenship benefits to Northern Ireland.</p>
<h4>Some other countries take away citizenship the moment the person acquires another nationality</h4>
<p>Numerous countries either ignore or prohibit dual citizenship. These include: Burma, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Finland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Japan, Kenya, Malaysia, Norway, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Singapore, Sweden, Syria, Thailand, Vietnam and Zimbabwe.</p>
<h4>Other countries, such as Japan or Germany, allow dual nationalities until a certain age</h4>
<p>In Germany, for instance, children of foreign-born parents have dual nationality until the age of 23, when they must decide which passport to keep. Only in exceptional cases, for example, if &#8216;&#8217;unreasonable conditions'&#8217; are imposed for giving up a foreign passport, will dual citizenship be permitted to continue.</p>
<h4>Some countries have loosened restrictions on dual citizenship</h4>
<p>In 1998 Mexico changed its laws permitting Mexican-born citizens of other countries to reclaim their Mexican citizenship. Previously, the citizenship of Mexicans was automatically rescinded when they took on new citizenship. The law also applied to anyone born outside Mexico whose mother or father was born in Mexico.</p>
<h4>Some countries recognize dual citizenship but strongly discourage it</h4>
<p>In the U.S., new citizens must relinquish their previous national standing unless that country permits dual citizenship; a person with two citizenships may not be granted security clearance, and a person who acquires foreign citizenship by voluntarily applying for it may lose U.S. citizenship. Most U.S. citizens, including dual nationals, must use a U.S. passport to enter and leave the United States. Dual nationals may also be required by the foreign country to use its passport to enter and leave that country.</p>
<h4>Hazards of dual citizenship</h4>
<p>Dual citizenship can cause difficulties. Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the U.S. has made it more difficult for certain Canadians to enter America. Canadians with dual citizenship in Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan and Syria may come under suspicion at the border and be fingerprinted.</p>
<h4>Certain countries may forbid a person from travelling with two passports</h4>
<p>If you travel to a country that prohibits dual citizenship and you have both a Canadian passport and one from your other country of citizenship, your Canadian passport may be confiscated or you may be subjected to a fine. You may be required to enter and exit a country using the same passport. If you run into trouble, Canadian consular services may try to help, but if the country considers you one of its citizens, there is little Canadian officials can do — their interest would be seen as meddling in internal affairs.</p>
<h4>Some countries require citizens to perform compulsory military service, or pay special taxes</h4>
<p>Others may require you to reimburse the costs of post-secondary education, or inheritances may not be allowed for people with dual citizenship. Some countries do not accept ignorance of the law as an excuse. You may be imprisoned or sent to military service. Even dual citizens who have passed the age for active military service may be considered in breach of their obligations for failing to report at the required time.</p>
<h4>Marriage, divorce and child custody</h4>
<p>Sometimes marriages performed in Canada may not be considered legal in other countries. As well, Canadian divorce and child custody documents may not always be recognized.</p>
<h4>Travel with your Canadian passport</h4>
<p>The Canadian government encourages people to travel with their Canadian passports, so it can intervene should something happen abroad. For example, the government has an agreement with China that anyone of Chinese ancestry who enters China with a Canadian passport is recognized as a Canadian citizen.</p>
<p>If you run into problems abroad, you can place a collect call to the 24-hour <strong>Operations Centre, Consular Affairs Bureau, Foreign Affairs Canada: (613) 996-8885. </strong> From within Canada dial: 1-800-267-6788 or (613) 996-6788. Or you can send an email to sos@international.gc.ca.</p>
<h4>Renunciation of foreign citizenship</h4>
<p>If you prefer to give up other citizenships, you may be required to go through an official process to renounce your nationality. This will entail formal approval from the authorities of that country. Even then, some countries don&#8217;t recognize renunciation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-21-dual-citizenship/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simplified Application Process</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-20-simplified-application-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-20-simplified-application-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-20-simplified-application-process/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The popular question these days is whether the Simplified Application Process &#8220;SAP&#8221; means shorter processing times? Well, I&#8217;m tempted to say that it is only wishful thinking (by applicants &#038; immigration lawyers). I think, CIC has introduced the SAP because they realize that the long wait and constant requests (by CIC) for further and updated [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The popular question these days is whether the Simplified Application Process &#8220;SAP&#8221; means shorter processing times? Well, I&#8217;m tempted to say that it is only wishful thinking (by applicants &#038; immigration lawyers). I think, CIC has introduced the SAP because they realize that the long wait and constant requests (by CIC) for further and updated information &#038; forms is torturous to applicants (and their lawyers). The SAP further reinforces a widely held belief that processing times will NOT go down anytime soon. Hence, once the SAP is submitted (with the correct fees) the visa posts will issue a file number which ensures an applicant has secured a place in the long queue.<br />
The Visa Office will request ssupporting documents when an officer is REALLY going to work on final determination of the file. This new scheme, however, will help alleviate some problems that incidentally also contribute to lengthening the processing time. Applicants won&#8217;t have to keep sending updates throughout the waiting time (the waiting time that was always mistaken for processing time - by CIC &#038; Applicants). Applicants won&#8217;t have to worry about changes in their circumstances (e.g. getting married or having an additional child, changing jobs, completying another diploma/degree). There will be a huge reduction in CAIPS requests and other Access to Information requests. These add to the numerous administrative tasks at the visa posts. Hence, we may see slight insignificant reductions in processing times.<br />
By the way, this does not mean that people who don&#8217;t quite qualify can apply while they expect to meet the requirements by the time the embassy requests the &#8216;final&#8217; supporting documentation. Applicants have to qualify at the time of submitting the SAP.</p>
<p>Finally, for those who were expecting the SAP to have a drastic effect on processing times, I&#8217;m sorry. The reality is, there is a finite number of visas for every embassy per year and the number of eligible applicants have increased many-folds. Hence, some people will continue to get their visas quite fast while others have to wait in line for their turn because once the annual quota is exhausted, CIC does not come forth and tell applicants the truth about the long wait &#8230; for the next year to kick in. This adds to the frustration, is disheartening and sometimes causes disillusion &#8230;</p>
<p>I think the wording of &#8216;Simplified Application Process&#8217; is misleading. It does not simplify anything. It is a simplified form that should have been called &#8216;Preliminary Form&#8217;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-07-20-simplified-application-process/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Landing Fee&#8217; - RPRF reduced</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-05-02-landing-fee-rprf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-05-02-landing-fee-rprf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 23:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-05-02-landing-fee-rprf/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2 May, 2006 - Effective today the Right of Permanent Residence Fee (RPRF) is reduced to $490. [from $975]

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 May, 2006 - Effective today the Right of Permanent Residence Fee (RPRF) is reduced to $490. [from $975]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-05-02-landing-fee-rprf/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foreign Students can work off-campus in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-foreign-students-can-work-off-campus-in-canada/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-foreign-students-can-work-off-campus-in-canada/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-foreign-students-can-work-off-campus-in-canada/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. Can all international (foreign) students work off-campus in Canada now?
A. No. Only those who meet the following:
•	study permit is still valid;
•	must have studied full time at an eligible institution (see list below) for at least 6 months out of the 12 months before applying;
•	must maintain satisfactory academic standing (as defined by the academic institution);
•	must [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q. Can all international (foreign) students work off-campus in Canada now?</p>
<p>A. No. Only those who meet the following:<br />
•	study permit is still valid;<br />
•	must have studied full time at an <strong>eligible institution</strong> (see list below) for at least 6 months out of the 12 months before applying;<br />
•	must maintain satisfactory academic standing (as defined by the academic institution);<br />
•	must be enrolled in an academic program of study; and </p>
<p>The work permit allows a student to work 20 hours per week anywhere while classes are in session and full time during scheduled breaks, including summer or winter holidays and reading weeks. The work permit will be valid of the duration of the current studies.</p>
<p>For now, students at other private institutions will have to apply for work permits to be able to work. This entails obtaining a job offer first.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a <strong>list</strong> of <a href="http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/study/guide-list.html"><strong>participating/eligible institutions</strong></a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-foreign-students-can-work-off-campus-in-canada/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canada still needs more immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-canada-still-needs-more-immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-canada-still-needs-more-immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-canada-still-needs-more-immigrants/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q. Overseas processing delays seem to suggest that Canada is no longer interested in attracting immigrants. What do you think?
A. The population of Canada will approach 33 million in the coming year, according to Statistics Canada, which began its 2006 census in Quebec on April 27, 2006.
In the last census in 2001, there were 30,007,094 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q. Overseas processing delays seem to suggest that Canada is no longer interested in attracting immigrants. What do you think?</p>
<p>A. The population of Canada will approach 33 million in the coming year, according to Statistics Canada, which began its 2006 census in Quebec on April 27, 2006.</p>
<p>In the last census in 2001, there were 30,007,094 people living in Canada, about 1.2 million more than there were in 1996. The Canadian birth rate remains anemic and the growth of the population relies on immigration, a trend that is growing, said the statistician. &#8220;More and more, the role of immigration is important,&#8221; Barnabe told reporters. &#8220;According to our projections, growth will depend solely on the contribution of immigration by about 2015-2017,&#8221; Barnabe said. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-04-29-canada-still-needs-more-immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Article with excellent diagnosis of the current status of Canadian immigration system</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-18-article-with-excellent-diagnosis-of-the-current-status-of-canadian-immigration-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-18-article-with-excellent-diagnosis-of-the-current-status-of-canadian-immigration-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 17:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-18-article-with-excellent-diagnosis-of-the-current-status-of-canadian-immigration-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feb. 18, 2006. 01:00 AM
ALLAN THOMPSON [Source: Toronto Star Newspaper]
Canada&#8217;s new citizenship and immigration minister, Monte Solberg, has a choice to make. Solberg will have to decide if he wants to be just the minister of immigration, or if he also wants to be the minister for immigrants. There is an important distinction.
For the most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feb. 18, 2006. 01:00 AM<br />
ALLAN THOMPSON [Source: Toronto Star Newspaper]</p>
<p>Canada&#8217;s new citizenship and immigration minister, Monte Solberg, has a choice to make. Solberg will have to decide if he wants to be just the minister of immigration, or if he also wants to be the minister for immigrants. There is an important distinction.</p>
<p>For the most part, Canada&#8217;s immigration ministers in recent years have concerned themselves almost exclusively with immigration policy, the intake of newcomers each year, how Canada will select those people, who gets in and who does not: our drive to attract the best and the brightest.</p>
<p>On the face of it, that would seem to be the primary responsibility of the minister of the Crown heading up the immigration department. But too often, ministers — with some coaching from their bureaucrats — have steered away from also being the minister responsible for the immigrants themselves.</p>
<p>As a result, it sometimes seems as if there is virtually no culture of client service in the immigration department. It doesn&#8217;t matter how long we make people wait or how agonizing it can be to get updated information on an immigration application. Many who have applied to sponsor family members or who are immigration applicants themselves can attest to the frustration of trying to use the immigration department&#8217;s telephone information line or the online e-client status service. Frankly, the immigration department often doesn&#8217;t communicate well and it is immigrants or would-be immigrants who suffer the consequences.</p>
<p>Some immigration officials operate on the assumption that it doesn&#8217;t really matter if people have to wait for years to get a reply from Canada. This country reserves the right to pick and choose who gets in and when. How long people wait in the queue is not our concern, these officials say. In fact, in some parts of the world providing better service would simply be a magnet for more applications, some would argue. So red tape becomes a mechanism for controlling the flow of applicants.</p>
<p>A minister who feels a responsibility to immigrants might well ask: is this the best way to run an immigration program? Have we ever thought of doing things differently?</p>
<p>And an immigration minister more concerned about the immigrants themselves would also demand to know how the government plans to resolve the conundrum of the growing immigrant underclass, a class populated by those for whom the Canadian dream has become a nightmare. For years now we have been confronted by the problem of immigrants who cannot work in their chosen fields in Canada or fail to break through into the workforce, despite their best efforts. That is because our immigration policy focuses on intake, not on integration. A minister who also feels a responsibility to immigrants would make it a priority — perhaps the top priority — to resolve the credential recognition and integration dilemma.</p>
<p>Solberg worked as a broadcaster for nearly 20 years before jumping into politics in 1993 as one of the original Reform MPs. He has no background in the immigration field and joked with reporters after his appointment that he hadn&#8217;t exactly been &#8220;pining&#8221; for the post. As one of only three cabinet ministers from Alberta, Solberg is also the first western Canadian in a generation to find himself in charge of the immigration portfolio. (Winnipeg&#8217;s Lloyd Axworthy held the post in 1980 and Saskatoon&#8217;s Otto Lang served in 1970).</p>
<p>And as an MP from rural Alberta, Solberg is the first immigration minister in a long time who does not hail from a major urban centre. While some would argue that puts him out of touch with the concerns of Canada&#8217;s major immigrant communities, it also gives him the latitude to act without any hint of favouritism.</p>
<p>Solberg comes to this portfolio with a clean slate. His party platform talked about getting tough on failed immigrants who have been languishing in the deportation stream. But the policy document also placed immigration firmly in the realm of building Canada&#8217;s communities. The Tories promised to cut by half the $975 landing fee charged to new immigrants and pledged to create an agency to speed assessment and recognition of credentials.</p>
<p>Solberg should act quickly on both promises and take up other challenges to prove that he is both the minister of immigration and of immigrants.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-18-article-with-excellent-diagnosis-of-the-current-status-of-canadian-immigration-system/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Minister of Immigration finally speaks &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-15-the-new-minister-of-immigration-finally-speaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-15-the-new-minister-of-immigration-finally-speaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-15-the-new-minister-of-immigration-finally-speaks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minister of Immigration, Solberg says no change to family reunification, overall immigration numbers
Bruce Cheadle, Canadian Press
Published: Tuesday, February 14, 2006
OTTAWA (CP) - Canada&#8217;s new immigration minister says the Conservative government does not plan to restrict family reunification nor change the overall annual target number for newcomers.
But Monte Solberg said the mix of immigrants - and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minister of Immigration, Solberg says no change to family reunification, overall immigration numbers</p>
<p>Bruce Cheadle, Canadian Press<br />
Published: Tuesday, February 14, 2006</p>
<p>OTTAWA (CP) - Canada&#8217;s new immigration minister says the Conservative government does not plan to restrict family reunification nor change the overall annual target number for newcomers.</p>
<p>But Monte Solberg said the mix of immigrants - and the means they use to enter the country - may need to change to reflect a greater emphasis on labour shortages. &#8220;I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the overall number that&#8217;s the issue,&#8221; Solberg said in an interview Tuesday.</p>
<p>&#8220;I think partly maybe it&#8217;s the mix. But it&#8217;s also using some of the other tools that we have to address some of the problems we have - like the work visas.&#8221;</p>
<p>Solberg is floating the idea of working with provinces and industries, especially the resource sector, to get more targeted, skilled labour into Canada on temporary work visas.</p>
<p>&#8220;Maybe ultimately if they&#8217;re here for a time and they&#8217;re doing a good job, well, permanently land them,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Solberg, 47, has been handed one of the federal government&#8217;s hot-button portfolios.</p>
<p>The former Alberta broadcaster and longtime finance and international affairs critic for the Reform, Canadian Alliance and Conservative parties is in a new role dealing with immigration matters.</p>
<p>He said his initial priorities are those laid out in the Conservative campaign platform: cutting the $975 landing fee; introducing new legislation to ease foreign adoptions; and creating a new federal agency to assist newcomers in getting their education and professional credentials recognized.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think any of those are necessarily contentious. Those are things we&#8217;re going to focus on.&#8221;</p>
<p>But Solberg knows he&#8217;s going to face some controversial issues.</p>
<p>In 2004, almost 236,000 newcomers gained permanent resident status in Canada. The country was on track for about 245,000 last year.</p>
<p>Some 57 per cent of the 2004 admissions were in the economic classes, including family members, while the other 43 per cent were those who arrived on compassionate and humanitarian grounds, including 33,000 refugees.</p>
<p>Some former Liberal ministers spoke of increasing overall immigration targets to 300,000 annually, if not higher, in coming years.</p>
<p>Last April, the Liberals promised to triple the number of family reunification applications processed annually to 36,000. Some critics - but not the Conservatives - accused the Liberals of pandering to immigrant communities on the eve of what was considered a crucial confidence vote in a minority government.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have no plans to change the number of people coming in under family reunification,&#8221; Solberg said Tuesday.</p>
<p>&#8220;But it also doesn&#8217;t mean there aren&#8217;t things we can do to ensure that we&#8217;re dealing with the skills shortage in this country . . . . Right now, clearly we&#8217;re not. We&#8217;re not dealing with those issues.&#8221;</p>
<p>Solberg said there are &#8220;big challenges respecting family reunification versus matching immigration to labour shortages.&#8221; He also said dealing with refugees remains a contentious matter.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s some real debates within these different portfolios.&#8221;<br />
The Liberals made another round of immigration promises, including a $700-million, five-year program to clear up applicant backlogs, in November just before the government fell.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-15-the-new-minister-of-immigration-finally-speaks/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>THE 2005 ANNUAL REPORT TO PARLIAMENT ON IMMIGRATION</title>
		<link>http://www.askmassood.com/2005-12-15-the-2005-annual-report-to-parliament-on-immigration-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.askmassood.com/2005-12-15-the-2005-annual-report-to-parliament-on-immigration-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Massood</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Immigration</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askmassood.com/2006-02-15-the-2005-annual-report-to-parliament-on-immigration/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OTTAWA, October 31, 2005 — The Honourable Joe Volpe, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, today announced that Canada reached its targeted annual immigration levels for the fifth consecutive year, attracting 235,824 new permanent residents in 2004. The details on the immigration levels reached, as well as the Department’s activities in 2004 to attract and welcome [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OTTAWA, October 31, 2005 — The Honourable Joe Volpe, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, today announced that Canada reached its targeted annual immigration levels for the fifth consecutive year, attracting 235,824 new permanent residents in 2004. The details on the immigration levels reached, as well as the Department’s activities in 2004 to attract and welcome newcomers, are outlined in the Annual Report to Parliament on Immigration tabled today.</p>
<p>The report presents the overall immigration ranges for 2006, including the commitment to admit from 225,000 to 255,000 newcomers to Canada as permanent residents. It also provides the target ranges for permanent residents to be admitted in each immigration class for 2006.</p>
<p>The report speaks to the need for a new long-term approach to immigration planning. Strengthened partnerships to improve the current immigration system so that applicants can be processed more quickly, and ensure a modern service delivery system that is efficient and responds to the needs of all Canadians, are a priority.</p>
<p>“Canada needs the drive, ambition and skills many newcomers bring to our country every year and we need to make sure they succeed once they arrive,” said Minister Volpe. I am fully committed to delivering the results Canadians need and want to secure the economic and social prosperity of our country for this and future generations.”</p>
<p>The department’s annual report, and its performance report for 2004-05, is available at www.cic.gc.ca.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://www.askmassood.com/2005-12-15-the-2005-annual-report-to-parliament-on-immigration-2/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
